貼圖、程式等,版主可任意修改或刪除,轉貼文章請多用連結,一天 (00:00-23:59) 請只開一個話題,請大家合作,謝謝。05/23/2019 16:49:16     意見庫存
 

外獨會意見交流

 

小學程度志向大,習近平不但反台獨、藏獨、疆獨還要引領全世界反對司法獨立

發言人:Super Doc., on Feb/18/2019    14:47:14 (IP code: X.X.33.174)
 

習近平:決不走司法獨立的路 要當國際規則引領者
作者 香港特約記者 麥燕庭 發表時間 17-02-2019 更改時間 17-02-2019 發表時間 15:11

中共總書記習近平在中央全面依法治國委員會首次會議上指出,必須堅持加強黨對依法治國的領導,決不能照搬別國模式和做法,決不能走司法獨立的路;而在「對外鬥爭」中,中國要以法律為武器,以法治之名向攪局者說不,並積极參与國際規則的制定,「做全球治理變革進程的參與者、推動者、引領者。」

中國事務學者林和立向本台表示,習近平的依法治國其實是黨中央說了算的法,是法治的倒退。而為了挽救習近平在國內的強勢,官媒遂在中國於中美經貿戰處處退讓的情況下刊登習的講話,儘管當中包括「不走司法獨立的路」這種被視為違背西方主流價值的說話,甚或說出儼如向西方叫板的要當國際規則制定引領者的說話。

直屬中共中央委員會的《求是》雜誌,前(15日)天上載習近平於去年8月在「中央全面依法治國委員會」首次會議上的部份講話。在題為《加強黨對全面依法治國的領導》的五千多字中,習近平指出,中共自「十八大」以來,共制定和修訂了140多部中央黨內法規,但在經濟發展和法治關係上,一些地方仍有「發展要上、法治要讓」的誤區;又或「立法上『放水』,執法上『放棄』」;亦有執法部門與黑惡勢力沆瀣一氣的情況,原因是有法不依、執法不嚴,把法律法規當兒戲。他明言,下一步是「執規必嚴」。他舉例時,更提及秦國奉行法家的「以法而治」而達成統一,並推祟以嚴刑峻法聞名的商鞅。

他指出,要做到自十八大以來提出的依法治國新理念,首先是要堅持加強黨對依法治國的領導,必須堅持「黨領導立法……,健全黨領導全面依法治國的制度和工作機制」;推進時,更須堅持走中國特色的社會主義法治道路,「要從中國國情和實際出發,……決不能照搬別國模式和做法,決不能走西方『憲政』、『三權鼎立』、『司法獨立』的路子。」習近平多次公開否定憲政和三權分立,但直接否定司法獨立則屬罕見。

國際方面,習近平表示,中國要參與國際事務,「必須善於運用法治」,「在對外鬥爭中,我們要拿起法律武器,佔領法治制高點,敢於向破壞者、攪局者說不。」而際此變革時期,中國「要積极參与國際規則制定,做全球治理變革進程的參與者、推動者、引領者。」


在中文大學兼教的評論員林和立指出,早前習近平提倡依法治國時,令外國學者印象深刻,現時應該清楚,習的法治與西方奉為圭皋的司法獨立根本是背道而馳,習近平的「法」,是黨核心的統治外衣和武器,「法」由中共控制、隨意修改和闡釋,並以「法」為工具來指揮國家、政府及社會,以「法」為國家令牌。他續稱,習近平是古人韓非的信徒,可以預見,習會以嚴刑峻法治國,中國的法治會進一步倒退。

至於黨媒為何在中國於西方忌憚中國發展、中美貿易戰關鍵時期刊登這篇立場強硬、挑戰西方核心價值的文章,林和立認為,講話主要是對內,在中國於貿易談判桌上「松章」(打麻雀術語,即「放水」)的情況下,當局更加要維持習的強勢形象,在宣傳上要營造一種即使不優於美國,亦能分庭抗禮的形象。

他總結,剛離世的毛澤東前秘書李銳形容已故的毛以無法無天為傲,在這方面,習近平與無法無天的毛澤東其實是相差不遠。
 

Record ID: 1550472434   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:泰伯, on Feb/18/2019    14:49:35 (IP code: X.X.245.255)
 這個厲害。

正好讓全世界看看中國和中國人的文明水平是怎樣的落後。
 

Record ID: 1550472434R001   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:泰伯, on Feb/18/2019    14:51:02 (IP code: X.X.245.255)
 給達官貴人或有錢人提供活摘器官大概沒有中國人會反對。 

Record ID: 1550472434R002   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:Ok, on Feb/18/2019    14:55:35 (IP code: X.X.165.207)
 001+100, 厲害👍我的強國? 

Record ID: 1550472434R003   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:Super Doc., on Feb/18/2019    15:23:39 (IP code: X.X.33.174)
 

習近平的文化水平只有小學程度是經過毛澤東的秘書李銳認證過

李銳:習近平只有小學程度且剛愎自用

作者 香港特約記者 甄樹基 發表時間 17-04-2018 更改時間 23-04-2018 發表時間 00:07
media

前中共中央組織部常務副部長李銳資料圖片

毛澤東前秘書李銳在病床上接受境外傳媒訪問時表示,中共總書記習近平上台以來,展現文化水平低劣,直言:“我那個時候不曉得他文化程度那麼低,你們知道吧?他小學程度。”李銳同時暗批習近平剛愎自用,聽不進中共元老的忠告。但李銳在接受美國之音訪問時,卻對習的父親習仲勛讚許有嘉。

李銳上周五剛剛度過他的101歲壽辰,接受訪問時,卧病在醫院床上,鼻子還插上胃喉。李被問到他和習近平的關係,李說,1980年代初他擔任中共中央組織部副部長,當時身負考察中共第三代領導人的重任,曾到河北省和時任正定縣委書記的習近平會晤。據報,習近平的父親、中共元老習仲勛當時要求時任河北省委第一書記高揚“關照”兒子,然而高揚卻公開此事,令習近平尷尬,難在河北繼續工作,最後李銳安排習跨省升級,調到廈門市當副市長,李銳從而可被視為習仕途的半個“恩人”。

上月10日李銳接受港媒訪問時,曾公開批評習近平搞終身制,在這次訪問中,重提他和習近平最後一次見面的印象。李銳說,習近平當上浙江省委書記後,一個人獨自宴請李銳一家三口,“一桌好飯,好得很。就四個人。因為他是習仲勛的兒子嘛,我就講話隨便一點。”李在席上提醒當時已貴為浙江省第一把手的習近平向上級大膽進言,但習散席時卻對李銳說,指李可以打擦邊球,但他本人卻不敢造次。

李銳在2013年出版的《李銳口述往事》亦提過這一段往事。然而,他在專訪中話鋒一轉,公開批評習近平:“我那個時候不曉得他文化程度那麼低,你們知道吧?他小學程度。”美國之音記者解讀,李批評習2012年上台後展現的文化水平低,對此大感失望。在香港資深的中國政治新聞從業員亦認為,李老此番話是評論習近平的思想水平。

記者又問李對習有沒有忠告,李銳突然沉默:“做不到,我也做不到嘞……這個人他現在能接受。(搖頭)不可能,不可能。”在《李銳口述往事》會見習近平章節中,李銳曾寫道:“人有權以後是會變化的。這樣的人我接觸多了。”


廣告

inRead invented by Teads
李銳雖在專訪中狠批習近平,但對習近平的父親、中共元老習仲勛讚許有加,坦言因看在習仲勛份上,才對習近平手下留情。李銳在專訪中思想清晰,中氣十足,反映一度病危的李老情況明顯好轉,“我也希望我再多活幾年。我自己感覺問題還不大”。

毛澤東文革期間號召知青上山下鄉,習近平1969年響應下放陝西延安學習。翌年中共恢復大學聯招,但仍禁高考,習近平透過推薦等,1975年考入清華大學,俗稱“工農兵大學生”。中共新聞網資料顯示,習近平清華大學畢業,在職研究生學歷,法學博士學位。

 

Record ID: 1550472434R004   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:PLAN, on Feb/18/2019    15:35:38 (IP code: X.X.137.61)
 台湾的媒体报道都没讲清楚所谓的毛泽东秘书是怎么回事

以至于很多人误解了他的历史角色,甚至于评论说当年助纣为虐云云

李锐是在1950年代关于长江三峡工程与长江水利委员会主任林一山的争论(李是反对派)中引起毛的注意,认为他有水平,“你来当我的'工业秘书'”

1959年庐山会议上被毛认为依附彭德怀,从此就被打入另册了
 

Record ID: 1550472434R005   From: 中國

回信 發言人:ddt, on Feb/18/2019    15:49:32 (IP code: X.X.153.69)
 法治主義 Rule by Law / Rechtsstaat vs. 法之支配 Rule of Law
法律、是一固定的權限。對比的、今日的法律行政是一流動的權限、不安定、及受外側的影響、主要是財金力及彼付隨的政治影響
A law is a fixed power. In contrast, the administration of the law today is a fluid power, in flux, and subject to outside influences, mainly the power of money and its concomitant political influence.
假定一辯護士、發見證據的重量傾向使彼的依賴人形勢一變、彼既刻使用無數的「文民手續」技巧、宣言證據不被承認、及彼相手的證人被彈劾或發見無資格、及彼自身開始反擊、為了一變對彼的依賴人之支持形勢。此技巧被稱呼為「訴訟手續」
If an attorney finds that the weight of evidence is tipping the scales against his client, he immediately employs one of the myriad techniques of "civil procedure" to have that evidence declared inadmissible, to have his opponent's witnesses impeached or found incompetent, and to mount a counterattack of his own to tip the scales back to favor his client. This technique is called "practicing law."
之前被苦勞準備的數多訴訟、已在一瞬間失去、在證人越出質問的範圍、及自發的申出更一層情報、破壞依賴人訴訟時
Many cases, which have been arduously prepared, have been lost in a twinkling when a witness goes beyond the scope of a question, and volunteers further information which destroys the client's case.
為了此理由、辯護士重度依賴於公判前的宣誓證言、或公判前發見。一旦向法廷提出寫植文字及本證書後、彼不得變更、解消證人自發的申出余分的情報、或變更彼的證言之恐怖。類似在連邦議會議事錄每日增刷的議會演說、證言易被集中的編集、變更、及削除、全然不向證人或法廷通知下
For this reason, lawyers rely heavily upon pre-trial depositions, or pre-trial discovery. Once these are typed up and presented to the court, they are set in stone, removing the fear that the witness will volunteer extra information or alter his testimony. Like Congressional speeches which are daily reprinted in the Congressional Record, the testimony may be subjected to intensive editing, alteration and deletion, all without any notice to the witness or the court.
公判前發見其他的工具、是書面質問及入場要請、兩方在宣誓下回答。質問、構成當事者最大亂用之1。彼時々擴大至約50~100回質問、若干的是如此巧妙的言表、促使回答疑問18者必然在疑問74再度被尋問、故、在回答中、必然有彼返答的矛盾
The other tools of pretrial discovery are written interrogatories and requests for admission, both of which are also answered under oath. The interrogatories constitute one of the greatest abuses of parties. They were sometimes expanded to as many as fifty or even one hundred questions, some of which were so artfully phrased that the party who answered question 18 would be asked it again in question 74 so that in answering it, he would totally contradict his answer to question 18.
1成功的法律訟訴之鍵 — 辯護士必然常故意敗訴、促使你被說得再度上訴
one of the keys to a successful legal practice—an attorney will often lose your case on purpose, so that you can then be persuaded to file an appeal
陪審團之弱點
陪審團有名的予測不能性、今引起一新的藝術、既陪審員的選拔術。此是一藝術、因為繪畫最終的組立、全然依存於辯護士選擇的陪審員。可稱呼此洗鍊的陪審不正手段; 雖然陪審不正理論上違法、此決不防止誰嘗試如此。陪審團一成員通常基彼最終的決定基礎於人種及性別的要因、或出廷的被告、假定她是女性、如何結髮
The famed unpredictability of juries has now given rise to a new art, the art of jury selection. It is an art, because the final framing of the painting depends entirely on which jurors the lawyers have selected. One might call this the fine art of stacking the jury; although jury stacking is theoretically illegal, this has never prevented anyone from trying it. Members of a jury usually base their final decisions on factors of race and sex, or on the way a defendant, if she is a woman, does her hair.
偶然的、O・W・Holmes氏、現代辯護士的守護聖人、在彼發言時如此意味、「法律、與公正無關係、在一勝利目的之決鬥裁判体制下—非正義。」彼續言辯護士被許可使用大群戰略及計略、覆隱真實、操作證人、及最卑劣動作迎合陪審團及裁判官。對審制度之哲學的正當化理由、是相手皆「勢均力敵」之主張
Perhaps this was what Oliver Wendell Holmes, the patron saint of modern lawyers, meant when he said, "The law has nothing to do with justice, under a trial by battle system in which the goal is victory— not justice." He went on to say that the lawyer can permissibly employ a host of stratagems and tricks to obscure the truth, manipulate witnesses, and pander to the jury and the judge on the basest motions. The philosophical justification for the adversary system is the claim that the opponents are "evenly matched."
陪審裁判、被「當事者對抗」辯護士的戰術、及裁判官對陪審團員慎重一方片寄的「指示」、縮小
.Jury trial has been diminished by the tactics of the "adversarial" lawyers, and also by the carefully loaded "instructions" which the judge delivers to the juries
世俗法退化: 海事法取替
英國係的世俗法、以3別個步幅展開:第1: 世俗法; 第2: 衡平法; 及第3: 議會法律制定。各々發展、意味日耳曼或古英國人原語的規則之更一層的薄弱化及逸脫。在合眾國中、我々有類似經路。米國法律始於憲法、既古代獨逸人非難的合祀、保護個人權利對強力的封建領主、既今日被稱呼為國家。之後、商業用的法律要件徐々以衡平法或商事法引繼、繼續的抑制法律的憲法指針
The Anglo-Saxon common law developed in three distinct steps: first, as the common law; second, as Equity; and third, as Parliamentary enactments. Each development represented a further watering down and perversion of the original Teutonic or Anglo Saxon precepts. In the United States, we have followed a similar path. American law began as Constitutional law, the enshrinement of the ancient Teutonic strictures which protected the rights of the individual from powerful lords, which today we call the State. Commercial legal requirements then gradually took over as equity law or the law merchant, continually subduing Constitutional precepts of law,
商事法的一定面被容認-商人要求一價格、及買手支付。有商品保證、負債被支付等。但、商事法有不穩的結果。第1、此常是國際性、雖然適用全國。第2、此全然不承認國境、或國家義務。國連、一商事法實体、使此明白化。舉一例、國連條約下、對個人的(叛國)反逆罪不得首尾逐行
Certain aspects of the law merchant are acceptable—the merchant asks a price, and the buyer pays it. There is a warranty on the goods, debts should be paid and so on. However, there are disturbing ramifications to the law merchant. First, it is always international, although it may be applied nationally. Second, it recognizes no national boundaries, or any national obligations. The United Nations, a law merchant entity, had made this clear. For instance, under the United Nations Treaty, the crime of treason against an individual cannot be successfully prosecuted
因為此發展、裁判官自体的職場、成為一貿易商品、被最高入札者競賣。類似司法的基準被利用考量當事者相對的勢力、影響及財源、故、司法官外衣成為一可販賣資產
Because of this development, the office of judge itself became an item of trade, to be auctioned off to the highest bidder. Just as the scales of justice are used to weigh the relative power, influence and finances of the parties, so the judicial robe became a saleable property.
共濟組合對司法干涉
雖然金錢依然是支配的要因、法律制度的誘導原則持續是對共濟組合命令的忠誠
Although money remains the ruling factor, the guiding principle of the legal system remains its allegiance to the Masonic order.
英國裁判官約50~70%是共濟組合石工。此數值、多分在合眾國更接近。辯護士既刻的發見在彼予期有任何依賴人、及彼有意在法廷勝訴、彼有必要參加共濟組合團、因為彼大部分的依賴人照會起源於此
fifty to seventy per cent of all English judges are Masons. This figure is probably close to that in the United States. Lawyers soon become aware that if they expect to have any clients, and if they wish to win cases in court, they must join the Masons, because of most of their client referrals will come from this source.
故、市民、全然不知彼已從順於一東洋專制的有罪推定、在法律口實上假裝。一公正正義如何施行、假定裁判官在死刑下宣誓、彼常給予彼共濟組合兄弟有利的判決?
Thus, citizens have no way of knowing that they have been subjected to the arrant assumptions of an Oriental despotism, masquerading under color of law. How can genuine justice be administered if the judge has taken an oath under penalty of death that he must always rule in favor of his brother Masons?
司法真實的專制、被彼憲法繼續的及秘密的破壞、及古黑貴族的獨裁工具、既英國特許的英國銀行、彼全世界的諜報帝國、秘密情報局、及彼奴隸及麻藥之巨大利益所產生的海事法廷之取替、達成。因為裁判官不再許可憲法在決定上擔一役、彼對在法廷上憲法議論的導入之反應、範圍從嘲笑至怒氣
the true despotism of the judiciary has been achieved by its continuous and furtive destruction of the Constitution, and replacing it with the dictatorial vehicle of the Black Nobility, the admiralty court, which was spawned by England's chartering of the Bank of England, its worldwide espionage empire, the Secret Intelligence Service, and by its enormous profits from the slave and drug trades. Because the judges no longer allow the Constitution to play a role in their decisions, their reaction to the introduction of Constitutional arguments in the courts range from derision to anger.
不公平司法
對於個人、準備及向最高裁判所提出一要約、是一時間及金錢的浪費。假定彼可能獲得特定利益之1之支援、既發見在彼窮境中、有若干推進自身訟訴機會時、彼有一機會、雖然可能性低
It is a waste of time and money for an individual to prepare and submit a brief to the Supreme Court. If he can enlist the support of one of the special interests, who see in his plight some opportunity to advance their own cause, he has a chance, albeit a slim one.
目前「裁判獨立」、「裁判裁量」、「司法免責權」的實行、在一自由社會是非常的。裁判官不過是一訓誡者或警察官、確定法令被遵守。誰也不可能在一守法規的社會中從彼行動的結果「免責」
The present practice of "judicial independence," "judicial discretion" and "judicial immunity" is intolerable in a free society. A judge is simply a monitor or policeman who sees to it that the statutes are observed. No one can be "immune" from the consequences of his actions in a law-abiding society."
我開發的3原則、既「Mullins法則」、有推敲的必要性。第1、「回答全部」意味如此。拒絕回答意味你訟訴的退去及是認、金錢的及悔悟的、必然對你發布
The three principles which I developed as "Mullins' law," bear some elaboration. The first, "Answer everything," means just that. Refusal to answer means a dismissal of your case and sanctions, both financial and penitential, will be issued against you.
第2格言、「否定一切」更重要。少數米國人、注意我國法廷制度是基於完全二重構造作動。司法手續的全部、被設計詐欺相手。你可能發見、直接的回答一表面上不危及你訟訴的質問、是無害、但結局是辯護士必然利用此反對你。只認你的姓名
The second maxim, "Deny everything," is more crucial. Few Americans are aware that our court system functions on total duplicity. Everything in the judicial process is designed to trick the opponent. You may see no harm in answering a question with a straightforward answer which apparently does not imperil your case, but the attorney will eventually use it against you. Admit only your name.
第3原則、既時回答、亦是法律泥沼之一部。1日遲延、意味你遠離訟訴以外。大部分米國人、假定一寬大的裁判官、及許可1日遲延應答。此決不可能發生、假定你代表自己、雖然裁判官習慣的給予彼仲間辯護士各種類的延期
The third principle, answer on time, is also part of the legal quagmire. A day late means that you are out of your case. Most Americans suppose that a judge will be lenient, and allow a day late in answering. This will never happen if you are representing yourself, although judges habitually extend all sorts of delays to their fellow attorneys.
投獄之害
永續維持此脅威的思考、對於古典的思想家、既發展我文明開化基礎者、必然被視為高度精神異常
The thought of maintaining such a threat in perpetuity would have seemed the height of insanity to classical thinkers, who evolved the cultural basis of our civilization.
耶穌會陰險的供述書之目的、常是制御。為了此理由、米國的司法制度、不僅主張告白、也在有罪判決後、一後悔自責的表現。大部分在我國法廷被若干政治犯有罪判決的米國人、獨善的拒否表明良心苛責、促使裁判官大喜給予、比較彼一般的判決宣告、假定彼屈服及噴出感情的自責、更嚴格的刑罰
The purpose of the Jesuitical confession is always control. For this reason, the American judicial system insists not only upon confession, but, upon conviction, an expression of remorse. Many Americans who have been convicted of some political offense in our courts self-righteously refuse to express remorse, which justifies the gleeful judge in giving them a much harsher sentence than he could have pronounced if they had grovelled and spouted emotional recriminations.
假釋之害
每日的仕事釋放、不監督的休暇、及早期假釋放的Gluckstern計畫、被集中的精神療法及同僚指導集會惡化。此計畫被注文給常習犯、多數在彼刑務所的獨房懸命於犯罪心理的心理學研究及精神醫學的論文。彼熱心抱擁耶穌會陰險的告白及自責的技巧、一打開刑務所之門的金色之錠。因為Gluckstern方法被特別作給犯罪者、殺人者、及強姦者中最冷酷無情的等級、此的利點決不提供給政治犯、抗議者及立憲主義者、既被強制配行彼全期判決的人
The Gluckstern program of daily work release, unsupervised furloughs, and early parole was compounded by intensive psychotherapy and peer counselling sessions. These programs were made to order for hardened criminals, many of whom had spent years in their cells boning up on psychological studies and psychiatric treatises on the criminal mind. They eagerly embraced the Jesuitical techniques of confession and recrimination as the golden keys which would unlock the doors of the prison. Because the Gluckstern method was tailor-made for the most ruthless classes of criminals, the murderers and the rapists, its benefits were never offered to the political prisoners, the protesters and constitutionalists, who were forced to serve out their entire sentences.
~Eustace Mullins, THE RAPE OF JUSTICE『司法的強姦』
 

Record ID: 1550472434R006   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:Haha, on Feb/18/2019    15:58:27 (IP code: X.X.114.134)
 李锐是毛政策的受害者。恨毛泽东,骂毛是正常的现象。他的政论就难免不实了。 全是带有个人情感的评论。  

Record ID: 1550472434R007   From: 美國

回信 發言人:Haha, on Feb/18/2019    16:37:03 (IP code: X.X.114.134)
 李就是一个不得志的书生, 酸气十足,看别人都不顺眼。 可怜,可悲而已。

只有蠢独听他的话顺耳, 因为他们对共产党毫无办法。 管他对不对,只有是骂共产党的人就是好人。 这该有多蠢啊。
 

Record ID: 1550472434R008   From: 美國

回信 發言人:Super Doc., on Feb/18/2019    16:57:02 (IP code: X.X.33.174)
 

中國五毛們,請不要轉移焦點

『司法獨立』是指司法權獨立不受其他政府機關或外界勢力影響,能夠公平審判

這是兩百年來文明世界追求的目標, 習近平的可笑在於他的不自量力,公然向文明宣戰
 

Record ID: 1550472434R009   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:愚叟, on Feb/18/2019    17:49:31 (IP code: X.X.143.120)
 習大大的宏願是當世界的總瓢把子。 

Record ID: 1550472434R010   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:台灣民眾, on Feb/18/2019    19:56:59 (IP code: X.X.245.242)
 知道妳們大家都很自私.所以必須把話說明白!!!!!

妳們想要搞統獨公投.那就必須要有三個勾選::::

1.贊成給中華人民共和國統治的!!!

2.贊成台灣獨立自治的!!

其他:3.贊成繼續維持現狀繼續繳稅罰錢養外省軍公教十八啪的!
 

Record ID: 1550472434R011   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:莫那魯道, on Feb/18/2019    21:10:30 (IP code: X.X.212.6)
 這是兩百年來文明世界追求的目標, 習近平的可笑在於他的不自量力,公然向文明宣戰
———————

一百年前,支那有群土包子殺洋人、拔電桿,海中翻去火輪船~

所以也有個瘋婆子不自量力,向世界宣戰~~

一百年後,支那照樣有群土包子厲害了、牠的國,手淫幻想救地球~

所以照樣也有個死胖子不自量力,向文明世界宣戰~~

支那人自卑自大、靠吹牛皮打手槍度日的劣根性百年不變~

所以支那被八國聯軍、遭全球輕賤的命運也是千年不改~

各位見版上諸如林畜醫、澳洲TZ這幫支那五毛、職業糞清,天天要不胡説八道、自取其辱,要不出言恐嚇、倒黑説白~~

明明自己就已經被世界強權包圍,牠們還自以為唯我獨尊咧~~

我想,當年支那被八國聯軍支解之前,義和團那幫土蛋也深信自己「神功護體」吧~~

厲害了,猊個支那人~~

~菸~
 

Record ID: 1550472434R012   From: 美國

回信 發言人:BMIC, on Feb/18/2019    21:15:59 (IP code: X.X.154.255)
 司法獨立?

那置我共產黨於何地?
 

Record ID: 1550472434R013   From: 美國

回信 發言人:沈黑朝, on Feb/18/2019    21:39:56 (IP code: X.X.169.47)
 中國不可能司法獨立!
簡單例子:
萬一中國國家重點企業策略性山寨外國公司專利產品後,被該外國公司告上中國法院,
儘管證據確鑿,中國法院能判外國公司勝訴嗎?
當然不能!
你外國公司可以到中國申請並獲得專利,
但是中國司法會保障你外國人在中國的智慧財產權益?
別作夢了,川普氣的就是這點!
 

Record ID: 1550472434R014   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:我見, on Feb/18/2019    22:11:33 (IP code: X.X.67.175)
 一旦司法獨立中共就玩完了

連「小學生」都知道這道理
 

Record ID: 1550472434R015   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:沈黑朝, on Feb/18/2019    23:51:04 (IP code: X.X.169.47)
 >>但是中國司法會保障你外國人在中國的智慧財產權益?
>>別作夢了,川普氣的就是這點!
=============================================
可能會有人反駁:難道美國如果有國家策略需要不也「徵用」外國專利或設計而不付費?
答案應該是:不會!
美國人對智慧財產的尊重與堅持相關法律是立國根本,例如:
有很長一段時間,美國NASA火箭引擎是基於俄國原始設計開發出來,NASA乖乖付俄國權利金。
俄國人從來不會懷疑美國人會不付費偷用。

但是俄國人就是不相信中國人會乖乖付技術權利金,
所以俄國賣給中國先進戰機時,都要三申五令要求中國不得擅自複制。
 

Record ID: 1550472434R016   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:temo, on Feb/19/2019    12:30:39 (IP code: X.X.158.133)
 HaHa 長年在台灣各個論壇瘋傳有關支那的假消息 

Record ID: 1550472434R017   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:難穏, on Feb/19/2019    23:48:23 (IP code: X.X.33.22)
 

你太抬舉自己啦 你好像每次都跟14億人的共主 席老大 站在同一個高度在比劃

你真是別人的一根毛都不夠格 你可能跟你的鄰居過過招 都難穏勝算 你需要吃藥
 

Record ID: 1550472434R018   From: 台灣

本篇到此告一段落———版主

WE ARE 49ER TAIWANESE