貼圖、程式等,版主可任意修改或刪除,轉貼文章請多用連結,一天 (00:00-23:59) 請只開一個話題,請大家合作,謝謝。05/20/2019 10:31:25     意見庫存
 

外獨會意見交流

 

川普:不急著跟支那達成貿易協議,但他們很急!

發言人:., on Mar/14/2019    07:31:45 (IP code: X.X.135.86)
 TRUMP: 'NOT IN A RUSH' TO MAKE DEAL WITH CHINA ON TRADE
TRUMP: U.S. HAS OTHER TRADE DEALS `COOKING'
TRUMP: CHINA HAS NOT BEEN DOING WELL, WANTS TO MAKE A DEAL

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-13/us-markets-extend-drop-trump-warns-not-rush-china-trade-deal

支那急什麼?

因為 南韓正式批准裝上THAAD(見樓下中笑的欄)
http://1949er.org/chat/index.php?read+1552492333

現在大家正等著 支那命令金正恩發射飛彈
 

Record ID: 1552519905   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:vvvv, on Mar/14/2019    08:13:07 (IP code: X.X.209.97)
 川普加油

給支那死⋯⋯
 

Record ID: 1552519905R001   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:Ciexn, on Mar/14/2019    08:14:48 (IP code: X.X.29.18)
  Hwever, despite the president’s claims to the contrary, economists have found that the full burden of the tariffs is actually being passed on to U.S. manufacturers and consumers in the form of higher prices, while U.S. farmers are being punished by retaliatory sanctions levied by China.

In addition, last week the administration received two doses of bad economic news. On Friday, the Labor Department reported surprisingly low job growth in February. That followed the announcement by the Commerce Department on Tuesday that the U.S. trade deficit, excluding services, hit its highest level in history at $891 billion in 2018. (Including services, on which the U.S. runs a surplus, the total trade deficit was $621 billion, a 12.5 percent increase over the previous year.)

The factors driving the increased trade deficit are many and varied, and often have little or no connection to the administration’s trade policy.
 

Record ID: 1552519905R002   From: 美國

回信 發言人:zhaotvoa, on Mar/14/2019    08:21:53 (IP code: X.X.29.18)
 Trade War


    China exports saw biggest fall in three years in February

  • 'Free Trade Crusader'
 

Record ID: 1552519905R003   From: 美國

回信 發言人:Simon, on Mar/14/2019    08:37:07 (IP code: X.X.67.122)
 >>>> economists have found that the full burden of the tariffs is actually being passed on to U.S. manufacturers and consumers in the form of higher prices,

什麼 burden ? 什麼 economists?

課徵中國 10% 關稅早在去年九月就生效了,
快半年了, 正面影響吧
實質薪資成長 1.9%, CPI 1.5%通膨又在控制範圍下,
unemployment rate 已經掉到 3.8,
這樣的局面下,還要期望每次非農就業增加20萬人,

這就太 over 了

 

Record ID: 1552519905R004   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:Simon, on Mar/14/2019    08:41:14 (IP code: X.X.67.122)
 
美國去年對中國貿易逆差創新高,

這是可以理解的, 因為搶在調高關稅之前大量進口

重點在今年
 

Record ID: 1552519905R005   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:Pngxtharng, on Mar/14/2019    08:42:25 (IP code: X.X.29.18)
  does many one know what's going on? 

Record ID: 1552519905R006   From: 美國

回信 發言人:temo, on Mar/14/2019    12:03:58 (IP code: X.X.158.133)
 >這是可以理解的, 因為搶在調高關稅之前大量進口

進口啥米? 都是有毒有鬼, 缺手斷腳的東西. 在萬聖節使用啊?
 

Record ID: 1552519905R007   From: 台灣

本篇到此告一段落———版主

WE ARE 49ER TAIWANESE