貼圖、程式等,版主可任意修改或刪除,轉貼文章請多用連結,一天 (00:00-23:59) 請只開一個話題,請大家合作,謝謝。06/20/2019 00:42:56     意見庫存
 

外獨會意見交流

 

大家小看Huawrei。所以川普直接拉抬到[ 國對國 ]

發言人:L, on May/26/2019    10:39:21 (IP code: X.X.218.118)
 Huawei (華僞$)不是民營企業。

綜合它的發展與存在的作為,合理懷疑它是,中國特殊的作戰軍團。

川普的措施,如同是宣戰: 國與國的局部戰爭。



 

Record ID: 1558838361   From: 美國

回信 發言人:temo, on May/26/2019    11:23:21 (IP code: X.X.158.133)
 同盟國對阿共國.

美支貿易首席談判 大鷹 Lighthizer/萊海澤 也到歐洲積極穿梭盟國投入圍剿, 還有喔, 就是鼓吹國家動員補助企業,
針對阿共那套.
不能還傻傻跟他玩市場經濟了.
 

Record ID: 1558838361R001   From: 台灣

回信 發言人:ciexn, on May/26/2019    22:36:23 (IP code: X.X.151.158)
  What did Huawei do to land in such hot water with the US? 

Record ID: 1558838361R002   From: 美國

回信 發言人:hosoad, on May/26/2019    22:52:45 (IP code: X.X.151.158)
 The official explanation, according to the initial executive order, is that Huawei hardware puts the US at risk for espionage. As the order puts it, “foreign adversaries are increasingly creating and exploiting vulnerabilities in information and communications technology and services,” and the “unrestricted acquisition or use” of hardware made by foreign adversaries makes those vulnerabilities worse.



TRUMP: Huawei is something that’s very dangerous. You look at what they’ve done from a security standpoint, from a military standpoint, it’s very dangerous. So it’s possible that Huawei even would be included in some kind of a trade deal. If we made a deal, I could imagine Huawei being possibly included in some form, some part of a trade deal.

REPORTER: How would that look?

TRUMP: It would look very good for us.

REPORTER: But the Huawei part, how would you design that.

TRUMP: Oh it’s too early to say. We’re just very concerned about Huawei from a security standpoint.


There are two claims here, which Trump makes quite clearly: First, that the restrictions were placed on Huawei because the company is a security threat, and second, that the restrictions against Huawei could potentially be lifted as part of a trade deal.

These two claims are incompatible — or to be more precise, they only make sense if the security threat is a bluff. You can’t negotiate away a security threat as part of a trade deal, for the simple reason that China can’t credibly promise that it will stop spying. No matter what deal Trump signs, China’s spy agencies will continue to seek out valuable information within the US. If Huawei was a threat before the deal, it will be just as much of a threat afterwards.
 

Record ID: 1558838361R003   From: 美國

本篇到此告一段落———版主

WE ARE 49ER TAIWANESE